2019 review of the media onslaught on The Sussexes


2019 began with the news media in full flow of rumours about rift between the Duchesses Cambridge and Sussex.  Rob Fatso, the royal editor of the London Evening Standard had began an unsubstantiated story after the Australia Royal Tour about the Duchess of Sussex causing a row over the choice of tiara for her wedding back in May 2018.  No matter what the story was made up by a staff at Kensington Palace and was an attempt by Rob Fatso to boost flagging sales of a Prince Charles book he had written, the story gained worldwide attention.  That began the open onslaught on the Duchess.

Within a week or two of Rob Fatso’s article, Camilla hound dog face Tominey wrote a story about the Duchess of Sussex making the Duchess of Cambridge cry during the measuring up of her daughter’s flower girl dress.  She referenced a Palace source as evidence of the truth of her story.  Rob Fatso also wrote again that the Duchess of Sussex had requested an air freshener to be sprayed through the Windsor Castle church, where the Royal Wedding was held.  The reason she was reported to have given, the church smelled of damp and old.  That story was a lie and Rob Fatso knew it.

The Duchess was also labeled as very difficult to work with.  An assistant she inherited, when she joined then Prince Harry at Kensington Palace, was suddenly reported to have quit.  Other staff members were reported to be unhappy as the Duchess sent e-mails and texts at 5.30 am to them.  A Metropolitan Police Royal detail was withdrawn, which turned out to be a personal reason, nothing to do with the Duchess.  Then there was Samantha Cohen their temporary Personal Secretary, who had retired as Assistant Personal Secretary to the Queen and agreed to work with the Sussexes for six months.  Contrary to demeaning reports that she had been asked to train Ms. Markle then in royal duties, she was there to work with the couple.  Far from working with a difficult Duchess, Mrs. Cohen worked with the couple until last month.  Six months turned into eighteen months.  The Duchess’s own beloved assistant had decided before the wedding for personal reasons to quit after her child was born.  She helped settle her and Master Archie at Frogmore Cottage and left.  There was no animosity, just a young woman, who wanted a change.  Since then, she was seen at the launch of the Smart Works capsule collection by the Duchess.  She told a reporter, she was there to support the Duchess.

The facts are the stories were fabrications but were the beginnings of the difficult months the Duchess referred to in her and the Duke’s documentary.  The story about Duchess of Cambridge crying could have been quickly blown out of the water, if she, through Kensington Palace, had denied it.  As long as it formed part of a nasty narrative being stitched up by the news media against someone who was raining on her parade, that was okay.  Neither did the Sussexes force denials through their shared media handlers at Kensington Palace, which was wrong in my opinion.

In the midst of a media out to harm the Duchess of Sussex, she went to her privately organised Baby Shower in New York.  She was in New York for at least three days before a paparazzi spotted all those presents, including flowers and suitcases being sent into the hotel.  That eagle-eyed paparazzi staked out and caught sight of blackened SUV vehicles stop in front of the hotel and out sprung secret service personnel.  Within minutes the Duchess was out, flanked by those men and women.  The paparazzi had won a lottery.  He posted what he was seeing on an agency website and soon the whole American Television networks had set up camp in front of the hotel.  She had been in the US for four days and all had been quiet.

Not much was reported that the Duchess gave out the flowers and the food prepared by a top-flight gourmet chef to charities in New York.  Of course, the British tabloid and conservative journalists were frothing at the mouth with synthetic anger about the event, even though it was paid for by her friends.  The Daily Gutter and Gutter on Sunday went further and sent a lying twerp to New York to dig up dirt on the event.  What he wrote about the cost of the Baby Shower, was quoted extensively by the news media across the globe.  The only thing was that he lied terribly about the total cost, which the Duchess has disputed in her Court case against that rotten cowardly newspaper group.

The Sussexes went to Bristol in South West of England on a royal engagement in snowy winter very early in the year.  They went to a charity that helps “ladies of the street” to overcome personal problems that draw them to the street and out of the game.  The visit was not pre-announced out of fear or respect for the couple.  However, the news media followed them to the charity.  They had followed them everywhere around Bristol, so they could not be kept away. The Duchess on impulse decided to write Inspirational words on each of the bananas being packed as food parcels to those women.

There was no harm in that at all, but the same usual Duchess Sussex bashers got on their high horses to heap condemnation on her.  The true mark of journalism is to do a follow up on a story to, either ‘kill’ it or give it legs and ran with it.  In this case, those condemning the Duchess chose to stay in the comfort of their London offices and did nothing.  If they had done a follow-up story or spoken to that charity, they would have found out that, what the Duchess did, generated so much interest and donations from Canada through the Middle East, of all places, to Australia.  They would not want to give any credit to the Duchess, so would not report the terrific results.

Meanwhile, so-called serious conservative journalists were seriously complaining about how the Duchess cradled her burgeoning baby bump in public.  They would not keep that among their friends and families but chose to write and say so in TV studios and opinion pieces in right-wing newspapers.  At the same time, they were quoting crazy stupid twitter and Instagram trollers, who claimed the Duchess was using a false pregnancy device to pretend she was pregnant.  For a responsible newspaper like the Daily Telegraph to join the Daily and Sunday Gutter, the Sun, the Daily and Sunday Express and the Daily and Sunday Mirror to propagate that narrative was very hurtful and awful. Their editors should hang their collective heads in shame.  The Duchess could be a daughter, a sister to some of them, but treated her with disdain.

At the same time, the tabloids were using the Duchess’s notorious dad and her demented half-siblings to torment her in interviews in their diabolical papers.  They paid thousands of US dollars to those dastardly people just to humiliate the Duchess.  Even though, word got around that the half-siblings had been out of her life for close to twenty years, that did not matter.  The father was in a totally different ballgame.  He was lying and colluding with people who were abusing her heavily pregnant daughter and seriously endangered her pregnancy.  I have never ever in my life, seen any father behave like that in public.  It was abominable and shameful and wonder how he could live with himself.  He has even sided with the Gutter Group Newspapers against the Duchess in her lawsuit against them.

Can we forget the brouhaha that generated all that silly guff at last summer’s Wimbledon Tennis tournaments?  The whole “don’t take pictures” of the HRH story was concocted to make the Duchess seem unfriendly and abusing her position.  That woman, who was extensively quoted lied through her dentures and would be punished by her God for what she did.  Her allegation allowed some idiots at the Gutter Group and the Daily Telegraph to insult the Duchess, with some asking her to go back to the US and take her son with her.  These were the same people, who wrote silly racist articles back in 2016 and who were up in bitchy arms wanting the couple to show their son in front of a hospital the very day he was born and wanted to have ringside seats at the christening of Master Archie.  Of course, they knew royal christening are always conducted privately, but they were forcing a special invitation from a couple they had done so much to destroy.

Some people in the news media still raise the so-called four private jet flights the Sussex were supposed to have made at the height of summer.  Of course, there is evidence of the flight to Elton John’s South of France home.  He invited them and paid to offset their carbon footprint.  There is no evidence whatsoever they went to Spain by private jet or at all.  The Daily and Gutter on Sunday Group pays handsomely for stories and pictures of the famous.  Pictures of the Sussexes would have fetched serious payout.  A greedy airport personnel would have quietly taken pictures with their mobile phones to make serious money if they flew to Spain.  There is no law against that, so why not.  However, there has been the absolute zilch picture of that flight to Spain since summer.  Yet even now, the question of the private jet flights comes up in media conversations about the royal couple. They know the flight to Spain was an egregious lie, but as part of their determination to tarnish the Sussexes, they would not admit to a lie and move on.

We have all read how the guest editing of the eponymous September issue of the British Vogue happened and the disgraceful abuse heaped on the Duchess by the usual suspects.  Why she could be abused for something other members of the Royal Family had done before her, was beyond the pale. That demonstrated in no uncertain terms that the criticisms were racially tinged and disrespectful.  The Duchess is, after all, a much better journo than her critics.  Camilla hound dog face Tominey even dared to go on television to suggest that, if the Duchess wanted to use her time to highlight charities, why could she not walk into a local charity shop to offer help.  The utter lack of respect this ugly woman has for the Duchess is surprising and uncalled for.  It is not that she is a terrific journalist, just an average one, who has had someone at Kensington Palace feed her with stories.

Whilst heavily pregnant she worked tirelessly on the Smart Works charity capsule collection.  She launched that successfully in September.  With her help, the charity is now known worldwide and is flourishing.  Has she been praised to high heavens by the media?  No, but a grudging acknowledgment of her power to achieve.  The Daily Telegraph has a girly magazine, which is supposed to support Smart Works charity but has that newspaper ever supported her, hell no.  Not when they had employed Camilla hound dog face Tominey as a Deputy Editor from the tabloid Sunday Express, for her so-called claims of exclusive royal stories, especially on the Duchess of Sussex.

The Duchess has basically done nothing wrong to warrant all those abuses that were heaped on her during 2019.  She spent part of the year out of the limelight because Master Archie wanted to meet Archbishop Tutu as a five months old tot.  The South African Royal Tour was very successful despite what the news media tried to portray it, because of the attack the Duke launched on some of them and the litigation in the Court of law by the Duchess.

The news media have done their best to misinterpret what the Duchess said in the Africa Tour documentary.  The interpretation they put on what a lot of people listened to at the same time, was that she was finding it difficult being part of the Royal Family and scrutinized in public.  But that was not her complaint at all.  Her beef was that she found it very unhealthy to keep the British stiff upper lip appearance, where even if one is suffering abuse, one kept quiet and said or did nothing.

She could not understand why the newspapers got away with lies and nothing was done about it, even when they know they are lying.  She said she knew it would be difficult, but at least as human beings, these journos would play fair.  As they are just carbuncles on the backsides of asses, that sense of fair play is out of the window.  As for scrutiny, one is scrutinized if one is up to no good.  What has the Duchess done to be scrutinized?  She did not obtain a loan from Jeffrey Epstein nor has she had her toes sucked by a financier or accused of anything.  So why would she object to being in the public limelight?  After all, she had a taste of that, when she was an actor and from what I have seen of her on royal engagements, nothing scares the living daylight out of her at all.

Meanwhile, over a week ago, the Duchess was acclaimed to be the most searched for members of the Royal Family, despite the concerted efforts by Kensington Palace and their acolytes in the tabloids to destroy her credibility.  She was followed by Duchess K Do-little and Master Archie, who beat his father to fourth place.  In fifth place was the combination of the Sussexes.  The Duke of Cambridge was eleventh and followed by his children.

The Duchess of Sussex’s overriding agenda is to find a way to totally ignore the newspapers and their online sites.  She could also ignore television news broadcaster like Sky News.  The Duke, on the other hand, reads the newspapers and is a worrier.  He could have got his wife to look at what the idiots write and say about them.  They should resolutely ignore them and get on with what really matters to them.

The other thing that worries the hell out of me, is the ineffectual way their media team handles media relations.  They cannot win in the old way the Monarch’s press team handled the newspapers.  The Monarch would always be respected, so her press team can ignore unfavourable stories about her family and she would be left out of it intact.

The world has changed for the worst.  The Sussexes media team seems not cut out for the brutal British tabloids and the conservative media manipulation.  I hate to say this bit, but they could learn from the Cambridges media team.  There, any horrid news item about the couple is quickly jumped on and nipped in the bud.  They do not allow a particular bad news item to fester and gain legs.

The Sussex Team has had eight months to get the hang of it to formulate a better and formidable way to defend and project the work of the couple.  So far, I am feeling a wee bit disappointed with what they are doing.  There has to be a change of emphasis for 2020.

Having got that off my chest, I wish you all, A MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A JOLLY PROSPEROUS, HEALTHY 2020.  MAY YOU ACHIEVE ALL YOU PRAY FOR!


18 thoughts on “2019 review of the media onslaught on The Sussexes

  1. Patricia Nixon

    Thank you Mr. Gilbert for another amazing and right on the head article. Happy New year to you and your family. Thank you again

    Reply
  2. J. Cedeno

    How can we place Mr. Gilbert’s article in a more public forum- like people magazine, etc.?

    Reply
  3. Joyce

    Thank you so much Amy,W for hitting the nail on the head. Your analysis is the very truth of what is happening to the Sussexes. They are upset that he is happily married to a woman of substance and he does not deserve it and the role he is in and doing it well. Their aim is to ensure the union fails and God will not allow it to happen. We will continue to pray and support them because we all know what cruel strategies they have in process to derail them because of pure jealousy.

    Reply
  4. Amy_W

    All this circus around them is incredible. When I see how they are pilloried for anything they can think, say or do, it breaks my heart. Unfortunately, all of this is just a cynical strategy on the part of the media on the one hand, but also a cruel game that some accept to play in the other hand.
    The reality is that all the second born of the royal families “the spare” were considered as problematic and that more generally still, the gutter press loves to invent or report scandals and controversies around the royal family as a whole.
    Besides, for the things the Duke and the Duchess are criticizing, what has not already been criticized or made worse by the royal family in the past: divorces? privacy for the children and not giving them royal titles ? socially unacceptable marriages? break the rules and conventions? travel? edit a magazine or record a show? promoting your activities on social networks? be an environmentalist? having Christmas break with the non-Royal part of the family ?
    What is deplorable in this whole affair is that the Sussexes are flamboyant, glamorous, happy and benevolent. Many will make them pay for a role that they do not think should be assigned to the “spare”. They probably preferred the time when they could make fun of Prince Harry in his Nazi costumes or his outings in Las Vegas. But today, the Prince has matured and it’s his happiness and his maturity in exercising his royal duties, alongside Duchess Meghan, that some people cannot accept. Unfortunately, their HRH the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are here to stay.

    Reply
  5. Joyce B.

    Bravo Mr. Gilbert! I cheered out loud reading this one (thank god I live alone) because you hit every nail squarely on the head. I laughed at the pseudonyms given to Rob Jobson and Camilla Tominey. The names you used were kind compared to the names I’ve called them. I feel as though an entirely tone would have been taken by the media if denials would have been issued by either KP or BP regarding the first two really nasty stories regarding making Kate cry and the lie regarding the tiara. Those two stories set the tone for more negative stories.

    Thank you so much for always carefully detailing events in your articles. Your articles are worthy of global publication. Hopefully as the Sussex Squad continues to grow in the future, your articles will reach more people.

    Happy New Year!

    Reply
  6. Vicky

    Thanks for another great piece mr Gilbert. The lack of integrity and ethics in our British media is a disgrace to journalism. There’s no difference between them with closer magazine or national enquirer. Can’t wait to read your next article. Happy new year.

    Reply
  7. Elizabeth Badu

    Once again your article was well written,impactful and full of knowledge, l sincerely hope in the year 2020 the Sussex’s team will up their game.,thanks for this amazing article je vous souhaite in bon annee monsieur

    Reply
  8. Diane Padilla

    Thank you for your analysis, well done my only humble analysis you don’t need the name calling except to use words such as bullies, toxicity, liars, hate mongers it makes your point more salient and maybe more edible for the soft followers and we need all the support, and most importantly truth will always win love will alway over come we don’t fight hate with hate or darkness with darkness but love and light

    Reply
  9. Joyce

    Thank you for this, you have to remember the only way to show their work which will be effective is through their instragram account because the press requires them to play the game of give us access for positive reporting which The Sussexes will not do and we wouldn’t encourage that either. Let those who want to play that game continue.
    I am sure the new year will be different, please continue your work as it is refreshing.

    Reply
  10. Joyce

    Thank you for this very evidenced information, you have to remember that majority of the lies was when they were still at KP and shared the same staff environment. It was difficult then to keep a lid on the lies because the information was coming fromKP, since moving out of KP the lies have now formed part of the legal suit. The tabloids with the lawsuits are still not playing ball because they are working with KP which they have been open about, it is not that the Sussexes media team aren’t replying they push back when necessary, take for example the birth of the baby it was handled very well as well as the christening.
    The strategy they have adopted is that there is no leakage of information and everything goes through their instagram account and the press have been kept out. They are only told anything if necessary and this has limited their access to the Sussexes, last week the RRs have admitted that KP is working with them. I am sure in the new year the Sussexes will have new strategy, the tabloid has still not responded to the court claims because they have no evidence. What does that tell you?

    Reply
  11. Donna Edwards

    Another excellent article Mr. Gilbert. KP and the BM are well-oiled lying machines. They have been creating this kind of mess for a long time. At this point, I really don’t know what the Sussexes can do to stop the negative media onslaught. It is clear there is a conspiracy to destroy the Sussexes. I know the Duke is trying to protect his family, but sometimes I wonder if he will be able to hold it together mentally to deal with all of the stress. This is a very sad and disturbing situation. For the sake of their mental health, marriage, and family, I hope they pull up stakes and leave the UK and let the Cambridges be all they ever be.

    Reply
  12. Mahevo

    Great year of 2019 review on the constant abuse of the Sussex by the BM. We look forward to more articles in 2020.

    Reply
  13. Winifred Morris

    Thank you for your well written piece Mr Gilbert I sometimes wonder how these people sleep at night but I know one thing for sure is that rain does fall at everybody door wishing you and the Duke and Duchess a blessed 2020

    Reply
  14. Kate

    Way to go Mr. Gilbert! Your opinion is well written, excellent to that matter. I always learned something from reading your article. Hope one day that these articles/opinions you’ve written find their way in magazines or newspapers. My wish for 2020 and the years to come.

    Happy New Year, Sir..and may God bless you in a million folds.

    Kate

    Reply
  15. Kimberly Ramsey

    Once again you have opened my eyes to the character assassination of the Dutchess of Sussex. Expect their family will turn to corner in 2020 as Sussex Royal foundation and household is fully established. Happy New Year to you, Mr. Gilbert.

    Reply
  16. Kagiso Malao

    Reading everything that The Duchess has been through is disheartening. Thank you for capturing this in this manner and we will continue to support the Sussexes. I wish their legal council exposes all that are involved.

    Reply
  17. Gladys

    A fine & virtuous piece, well done Mr. Gilbert looking forward to your heartening, moving & uplifting articles come 2020,
    WISH YOU TOO A HEALTH NEW YEAR🎆🎇

    Reply
  18. Dominique Ravenel

    Comme d’habitude votre article est juste et précis. Je vous rejoins sur leur équipe média mais cela n’est pas aussi simple et n’oublions pas les procès. Il y a sûrement une stratégie sous ce semblant de lenteur . L’équipe des Cambridges est certes mieux rodée mais je pense que les Sussex affineront leurs réponses et leurs stratégies face aux tabloïds. Leur maison est jeune et les fondations doivent être mises en place et solidifiée.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *